- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22409 WP No. 9801 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.9801 OF 2023 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SRI CHETHAN H.K. S/O. LATE KARIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS RESIDING AT HEBBALU VILLAGE (POST) K.R. NAGARA MYSURU DISTRICT-571 602. …PETITIONER (BY SRI YASHAS K., ADVOCATE FOR SRI VENKATESH PRASAD R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER HASSAN TALUK HASSAN-573 201. 3. THE TAHSILDHAR HASSAN TALUK HASSAN-573 201. 4. THE REVENUE INSPECTOR KASABA HOBLI HASSAN TALUK Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22409 WP No. 9801 of 2023 HASSAN-573 133. 5. THE VILLAGE ACCONTANT KASABA HOBLI HASSAN TALUK HASSAN-573 133. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI MANJUNATH K., H.C.G.P.) * * * THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER VIDE ANNEXURE-A DATED 5-9- 2022 CHALLENGING THE ORDER PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.3 IN RRT(D)/207/2022-23, IN RESPECT OF LAND BEARING SURVEY NO.27/13 MEASURING 11/2 GUNTAS SITUATED AT SANKALAPURA VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK, HASSAN AND FURTHER TO QUASH THE ENTRIES IF ANY, MADE IN FAVOUR OF THE RESPONDENT NOS.1 TO 5 ON THE BASIS OF THE IMPUGNED ORDER AT ANNEXURE-A AND ETC. THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22409 WP No. 9801 of 2023 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. The petitioner herein is assailing the order in RRT(D)/207/2022-23 dated 05.09.2022 (Annexure-A) passed by Respondent No.3. 3. Having taken note of the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned HCGP, the order impugned at Annexure-A is appealable under Section 136(2) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act. 4. In that view of the matter, the writ petition is not maintainable. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner herein to avail the efficacious remedy provided under the said Act. Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. All contentions of the parties are kept open. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22409 WP No. 9801 of 2023 Needless to state that, in the event, if the petitioner herein approach the competent authority under Section 136(2) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, the period spent by the petitioner before this Court be condoned, in terms of Section 14 of the Limitation Act. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE DH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 64