Page No.# 1/3 GAHC020001582025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : FA/2/2025 MR. RUOKUONEILIE KESIEZIE S/O LATE KEDUOSIEVI KESIEZIE, R/O A30, L-KHEL,KOHIMA VILLAGE, KOHIMA NAGALAND VERSUS MAHINDRA AND MAHINDRA LTD. AND 2 ORS REGISTERED OFFICE- GATEWAY CUILDING, APOLLO BUNDER, MUMBAI, MAHARASHTRA 2:MR. S. SANTHANAMAN COMPANY REPRESENTATIVE IN CHARGE ZONAL HEAD EAST CUSTOMER CARE MAHINDRTA AND MAHINDRA LTD. AUTOMOTIVE SECTOR-7 KYD STREET 3RD FLOOR KOLKATA WEST BENGAL 3:MR. ARINDAMROY CHOWDHURY COMPANY REPRESENTATIVE IN CHARGE REGIONAL HEAD GUWAHATI MAHINDRA AND MAHINDRA LTD. AUTOMOTIVE SECTOR Advocate for the Petitioner : A. ZHIMOMI, G KAMEI,NEITSEIZONUO SOLO,LHOUSINO,ESTHER,JOSHUA SHEQI Advocate for the Respondent : AKHRIEU CHUSI, IMTI CHANG,THEJANUO METHA Page No.# 2/3 Linked Case : I.A.(Civil)/45/2025 MR. RUOKUONEILIE KESIEZIE S/O LATE KEDUOSIEVI KESIEZIE R/O A30 L-KHEL KOHIMA VILLAGE KOHIMA NAGALAND VERSUS MAHINDRA AND MAHINDRA LTD. AND 2 ORS REGISTERED OFFICE- GATEWAY CUILDING APOLLO BUNDER MUMBAI MAHARASHTR 2:MR. S. SANTHANAMAN COMPANY REPRESENTATIVE IN CHARGE ZONAL HEAD EAST CUSTOMER CARE MAHINDRTA AND MAHINDRA LTD. AUTOMOTIVE SECTOR-7 KYD STREET 3RD FLOOR KOLKATA WEST BENGAL 3:MR. ARINDAMROY CHOWDHURY COMPANY REPRESENTATIVE IN CHARGE REGIONAL HEAD GUWAHATI MAHINDRA AND MAHINDRA LTD. AUTOMOTIVE SECTOR. ------------ Advocate for : A. ZHIMOMI Advocate for : appearing for MAHINDRA AND MAHINDRA LTD. AND 2 ORS Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE YARENJUNGLA LONGKUMER ORDER 31/07/2025 This application under Section 149 of the Civil Procedure Code has been filed praying for leave of this Court to file the connected appeal FA/2/2025 against the Judgment dated 27.11.2024 and Decree dated 28.11.2024, passed by the Court of the Civil Judge Senior Division, Kohima, Nagaland with deficit Court fees. Learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Joshua Sheqi submits that the requisite court fees stamps have already been deposited to the Registry of this Court and therefore, submits that the petition may be disposed of. In view of the fact that the deficit Court fees has already been deposited in the Court, this application is disposed of as infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant