Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23091 (HP)

SUNDER LAL v. STATE OF HP AND ORS

CWP/13444/2025 · 2025-08-22

Satyen Vaidya

Civil Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:HHC:28505 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA Civil Writ Petition No. 13444 of 2025. Date of decision: 22 nd August, 2025. Sunder Lal ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Bonit, Advocate, vice counsel. For the Respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Addl. A.G. and Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Dy. A.G. Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral). Notice. Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. By way of instant petition, the petitioner has made a prayer to direct the respondents to either regularize his services or grant work charge status from the date he completed 8 years of continuous daily wage service. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance on the judgment passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.1595 of 2025, titled State of H.P. & others vs. Suraj Mani & another, decided on 6th February, 2025. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 ( 2025:HHC:28505 ) 3. In view of the fact that the petitioner has restricted his claim for grant of work charge status on completion of 8 years continuous daily wage service, this petition can be disposed of by issuing direction to the respondents to consider and decide the case of the petitioner for grant of work charge status immediately on completion of 8 years continuous daily wage service, strictly in terms of judgment passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court in Suraj Mani (supra). Ordered accordingly. 4. The respondents are directed to consider and decide the case of the petitioner in light of Suraj Mani (supra) for grant of work charge status on completion of 8 years continuous daily wage service. The decision shall be taken by the competent authority within eight weeks from the date of passing of this order. 5. Petition is accordingly disposed of along with pending application(s), if any (Satyen Vaidya) Judge 22nd August, 2025. (jai)