APHC010325262021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 19511/2021 Between: 1. GOLI SARATH BABU ALIAS SARATH REDDY, S/O VENKAT REDDY, AGED 42 YEARS, OCC. CIVIL CONTRACTOR, R/O PLOT NO. C 4, HARSHA CLASSIC, NEAR AMALODABHAVI SCHOOL, ASHOK NAGAR, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI,AMARAVATHI. 2. THE CHAIRMAN, 14TH FINANCE GRANTS COMMISSION (XIV-FC), NOW 15TH FINANCE GRANTS COMMISSION (XV-FC), 21ST FLOOR, JAWAHAR VAYAPAR BHAWAN, TOLSTOY MARG, NEW DELHI - 110001. 3. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI,AMARAVATHI. 4. THE DIRECTOR, PAY AND ACCOUNTS, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI,AMARAVATHI 5. THE DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, , OFFICE OF DMA AT GORANTLA, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2 6. THE ELURU MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 7. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. . ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P NARAHARI BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING 2. M MANOHAR REDDY (SC FOR MUNC AND MUNC CORP ) 3. HARINATH N (Asst Solicitor General) 4. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV The Court made the following: 3 ORDER:- Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the action of Respondents in not paying part pending bills to the petitioner for the work construction of BT Road from Mango Bar Ele Pole No.SS 39 A4 to Main Road in Div.No.6 of Eluru vide agreement No.7/2020-21, dated 05.06.2020, executed under Measurement Book. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that amount has been credited to the account of the petitioner. 4. Recording the same, this Court is of the view that no further adjudication is required on merits. 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 12.09.2025 SR