Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23076 (PAT)

Navneet Kumar @ Dipesh Yadav @ Dibuu Yadav v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./14273/2025 · 2025-09-02

Purnendu Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14273 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-388 Year-2024 Thana- SHEKHPURA District- Sheikhpura ====================================================== 1. Navneet Kumar @ Dipesh Yadav @ Dibuu Yadav S/o- Rajendra Yadav Resident of village-Kare, PS- Sheikhpura Dist-Sheikhpura 2. Budhan Yadav @ Banaras Yadav S/o- Bhuneshwar Yadav Resident of village-Kare, PS- Sheikhpura Dist-Sheikhpura 3. Uday Yadav S/o- Naval Yadav Resident of village-Kare, PS- Sheikhpura Dist-Sheikhpura 4. Raman Yadav @ Ramanand Kumar S/o- Naresh Yadav Resident of village- Kare, PS- Sheikhpura Dist-Sheikhpura 5. Lav Kumar S/o- Late Saryug Yadav Resident of village-Kare, PS- Sheikhpura Dist-Sheikhpura 6. Kush Yadav @ Kush Kumar S/o- Bhuneshwar Yadav Resident of village- Kare, PS- Sheikhpura Dist-Sheikhpura ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Ms. Kumari Anupam, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rana Randhir Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 4 02-09-2025 Heard Ms. Kumari Anupam, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. Rana Randhir Singh, learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioners seek pre-arrest bail in connection with Sheikhpura P.S. Case No. 388 of 2024 registered for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 329(3), 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 109, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14273 of 2025(4) dt.02-09-2025 2/2 3. Considering the nature of allegation made in the FIR, as well as, the criminal antecedents of the petitioners, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on pre-arrest bail. 4. The petitioners, if so advised, may seek regular bail before the learned District Court. The learned District Court is directed to pass a necessary order, in accordance with law, on the basis of materials available on record, on the same day, the bail application is filed, without any further delay and without being prejudiced by any observation made by this Court. 5. Accordingly, the present bail application stands disposed of. Ashishsingh/- (Purnendu Singh, J) U T