. Hamender Kumar Vs. State of H.P. & Ors. CMP No. 20811 of 2025 in CWP No. 1946 of 2017. 29.08.2025 Present: Mr. R.L. Chaudhary, Advocate, for the non- applicant/petitioner. Mr. Surya Chauhan, Advocate, vice applicant/respondents No.10(a) to 10(e). By way of this application in a disposed of matter, the applicants/private respondents prays for extension of time to comply with judgment dated 02.04.2025. The writ petition filed by the petitioner was disposed of by this Court on 02.04.2025, in the following terms:- “4. In the light of the request so made, without making any observation on the merit of the case, this petition is disposed of with the direction that the proceedings that may be pending with regard to the alleged encroachment be decided by the Authorities concerned as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law by adhering to the principles of natural justice and preferably within a period of six months from today. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any also stand disposed of accordingly.” In light of the fact that this Court only directed the Authorities to decide the cases of encroachment within a time bound period, this application at the behest of the applicants/private respondents, is not maintainable, as the direction was to the Authorities concerned, onus is upon them to comply with the judgment passed by the Court. Application stands disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge August 29, 2025 (Shivank Thakur)