BABLU SAGAR AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
A482/15209/2023 · 2025-04-07
Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23067 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23067 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:52303 Court No. - 75 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 15209 of 2023 Applicant :- Bablu Sagar And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Vikash Chandra Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.
1. Vakalatnama filed by Sri Navneet Kumar Shukla on behalf of opposite party no. 2 is taken on record. 2. Heard Sri Vikash Chandra Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Anjit Kumar Verma, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Navneet Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and Sri Ramesh Kumar, learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. The present application has been filed to quash the entire proceeding of Criminal Case No. 321 of 2021 (State Vs. Bablu Sagar and others) as well as cognizance order dated 10.11.2021 and charge sheet dated 12.06.2021 against applicant no.1 u/s 498-A, 323, 504 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act and against applicant nos. 2 and 3 u/s 498-A, 504 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, bearing Case Crime No. 192 of 2020, Police Station- Mahila Thana, District- Ghaziabad, pending before Civil Judge (Junior Division)/Fast Track Court No.1 (Crime Against Women), Ghaziabad. 4. It is jointly submitted by learned counsel for the applicants and learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 that dispute between the parties is matrimonial in nature. Now, they have settled their dispute amicably and a written compromise dated 09.02.2023 has also been entered into between them. Copy of the same has been annexed as Annexure No. 5 to the
application. It is further submitted that the aforesaid compromise has already been filed before the court below and a request has been made that on the basis of the written compromise, impugned proceedings may be quashed. 5. Per contra, learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer on the ground that the aforesaid compromise is yet to be verified by the court below. 6. Considering the aforesaid submissions of both the parties, the present application is disposed of with direction to the court below to verify the compromise dated 09.02.2023 after summoning the parties within a period of two months from the date of receiving copy of this order. After verification of the aforesaid compromise, court below will permit the parties to obtain certified copy of the same. 7.
After verification of the compromise, court below will dispose of the impugned proceeding, in accordance with law. 8. For a period of two months, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants. 9. It is further provided that applicants are at liberty to file fresh application u/s 528 B.N.S.S., if required, to quash the impugned proceeding on the basis of verified compromise. Order Date :- 8.4.2025 KS Digitally signed by :- KISHAN SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad