CHHATTISGARH RAJYA GRAMIN BANK v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
WPC/2585/2025 · 2025-05-14
Shri Radhakishan Agrawal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23066 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23066 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:22063
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2585 of 2025 Chhattisgarh Rajya Gramin Bank Through Authorised Officer, Govind Vishwakarma, S/o Shri Shiv Charan Vishwakarma, Aged About 36 Years, Office At Chhattisgarh Rajya Gramin Bank, Regional Office, Ambikapur, Sarguja, District Sarguja (C.G.)
... Petitioner. versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Revenue And Disaster Management Department, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - District Magistrate, Sarguja District- Sarguja, Chhattisgarh 3 - M/s. Agrawal Sentring Through Proprietor- Smt. Bulbul Agrawal, W/o- Navin Kumar Agrawal, R/o- Shiv Shahi Para, Sarga, Sitapur, Sarguja, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh 4 - Shiv Kumar Agrawal S/o Late Shiv Chand Agrawal R/o Shiv Shahi Para, Sarga, Sitapur, Sarguja, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh 5 - Mohan Agrawal S/o Late Shiv Chand Agrawal R/o- Bhagat Singh Chowk, Sitapur, Sarguja, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh 6 - Vinod Agrawal S/o Late Shiv Chand Agrawal R/o- Katnal Para, Sitapur, Sarguja, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh 7 - Manoj Agrawal S/o Late Shiv Chand Agrawal R/o- Bhagat Singh Chowk, Sitapur, Sarguja, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh 8 - Keshar Devi W/o Late Shiv Chand Agrawal R/o- Shiv Shahi Para, Sarga, Sitapur, Sarguja, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh
... Respondents. AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI Digitally signed by AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI Date: 2025.05.16 11:20:53 +0530
2 For Petitioner : Mr. Saket Pandey, Advocate. For Res No.1 & 2/State : Mr. Satish Gupta, Govt. Advocate.
Hon’ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal, Order on Board 15/05/2025
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to file better constituted petition in accordance with law.
2. In view of above submission, this petition is disposed of as withdrawn reserving the liberty as prayed for.
3. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. Sd/-
(Radhakishan Agrawal) JUDGE ajay