Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2025:HHC:28519 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
CWP No.13194 of 2025
Decided on: 22nd August, 2025
Chanan Singh
.......Petitioner
versus
HRTC and another
...Respondents
Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner: Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Suri, Advocate.
For the respondents: Ms.Shrutika, Advocate vice Mr.Dheeraj K. Vashisth, Advocate.
Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral)
Notice. Ms. Shrutika, Advocate vice Mr. Dheeraj K. Vashisth, Advocate appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
2.
Learned counsel representing the petitioner, on instructions, states that the petitioner’s case is squarely covered by the judgment dated 8.7.2021 passed by Division Bench of this Court in CWP No. 3278 of 2021, titled Baldev Chand vs. Himachal Road Transport Corporation and another and as such, he would be content and satisfied in case directions are issued to the respondents to consider and
1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.
( 2025:HHC:28519 ) 2
decide the representation (Annexure P-2) having been filed by the petitioner, in a time bound manner.
3.
Ms. Shrutika, Advocate vice Mr. Dheeraj K. Vashisth, Advocate while putting appearance on behalf of the respondents, fairly states that she is not averse to aforesaid innocuous prayer made on behalf of the petitioner. 4.
Consequently, in view of the above, this Court without going into the merits of the case deems it fit to dispose of the present petition with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the pending representation (Annexure P- 2) of the petitioner expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks in light of Baldev Chand (supra). Ordered accordingly. Needless to say, authority concerned, while doing the needful in terms of instant order, shall afford an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and pass a speaking
order thereupon. Liberty is reserved to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings in appropriate court of law, if he still remains aggrieved. Pending applications, if any, also stand
disposed of. August 22, 2025
( Satyen Vaidya ) (naveen)
Judge