Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23056 (RAJ)

ANURAG BHATI S/O VIRENDRA SINGH BHATI v. THE CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR

CW/10641/2024 · 2025-09-18

Mahendar Kumar Goyal

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:38283] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10641/2024 1. Anurag Bhati S/o Virendra Singh Bhati, Aged About 38 Years, R/o 222/44, Uday Villa, Naya Ghar, Shiv Colony, Gulab Bari, Ajmer, Rajasthan. 2. Kalu Jat S/o Mathura Jat, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Sadar Bajar, Ban Ka Khera, Bhilwara, Rajasthan. 3. Anees Mohammad S/o Nizam Mohammad Mansuri, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Nathi Ka Jav, Ward No. 06, Gandhi Nagar, Kishangarh, Ajmer, Rajasthan. 4. Sandeep Sharma S/o Ram Swaroop Sharma, Aged About 36 Years, R/o 10/486, Swarn Path, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 5. Ravi Kumar Ray S/o Chandeshwar Ray, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Gonouli, Ward No. 12, Bettiah, Post Bettiah, West Champaran, Bihar. 6. Yogendra Kumar S/o Govind Singh, Aged About 36 Years, R/o 119, Jato Ka Mohalla, Bansroli, Gudawli, Bharatpur, Rajasthan. 7. Amit Kumar S/o Sukhram, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Dhandhal, Chaina, Gulpura, Churu, Rajasthan. 8. Nitesh Kumar Sharma S/o Jamna Shankar Sharma, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Plot No. 22 A, Love Kush Nagar, Manyawas, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 9. Pawan Kandela S/o Ramgopal Kandela, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Kandela House, Near Jhag Bus Stand, Bagru, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 10. Dalip Kumar S/o Damodar Prasad, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Plot No. 66, Flat No. F-2, Arnav Residency, Near Sikar Road No. 3, Behind Brilliant School, Murlipura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 11. Prakash Yadav S/o Roodmal Yadav, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Indokiya, Bhambori, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 12. Divakar Dhenwal S/o Munna Lal, Aged About 36 Years, R/o 7, Harijan Mohalla, Ward No. 29, Sujangarh, Churu, Rajasthan. 13. Omprakash Nagar S/o Balram Nagar, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village Bacchihera, Post Hingoniya, Kota, Rajasthan. [2025:RJ-JP:38283] (2 of 3) [CW-10641/2024] 14. Rekha Mali D/o Moolchand Mali, Aged About 34 Years, R/o C-Ii/6, Data Nagar, Jatiya, Hills Ramble Road, Ajmer, Rajasthan ----Petitioners Versus 1. The Chairman Cum Managing Director, Jaipur Metro Rail Corporation Limited, Khanij Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C- Scheme, Jaipur- 302005. 2. The Director (Company Matters), Jaipur Metro Rail Corporation Limited, Khanij Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C- Scheme, Jaipur-302005. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini with Mr. Gopesh Kumar For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Order 18/09/2025 Although, in the writ petition, the petitioners have sought a direction to the respondents to create a promotion policy for the diploma holders engineers; but, learned counsel submits that he would feel contented if the respondents are directed to decide their pending representations expeditiously received by them on 20.06.2024. Taking into consideration the nature of prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners and a judgment of this Court in the case of Pawan Meena Vs. The State of Rajasthan and Others: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1665/2024, this Court [2025:RJ-JP:38283] (3 of 3) [CW-10641/2024] deems it just and proper to dispose of this writ petition in following terms without issuing notice to the respondents:- “The respondents are directed to pass a speaking and reasoned order on the representation filed by the petitioners and received by them on 20.06.2024-(Annexure-3) within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of this order with communication of the decision to the petitioners.” Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of accordingly. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J Tahir/31