STATE OF NAGALAND AND 3 ORS v. SHRI PHUSHITO AYEMI AND ANR
I.A.(Civil)/3/2025 · 2025-02-23
Kakheto Sema, Kardak Ete
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23047 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23047 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/4 GAHC020000052025 2025:GAU-NL:51-DB
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3/2025 STATE OF NAGALAND AND 3 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY GOVT. OF NAGALAND KOHIMA NAGALAND 2: COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY GOVT. OF NAGALAND DEPT. OF WORKS AND HOUSING GOVT. OF NAGALAND 3: ENGINEER-IN-CHIEF DEPT. OF WORKS AND HOUSING GOVT. OF NAGALAND KOHIMA NAGALAND 4: CHIEF ENGINEER PWD (NATIONAL HIGHWAYS) GOVT. OF NAGALAND KOHIMA NAGALAN VERSUS SHRI PHUSHITO AYEMI AND ANR R/O PHUSHITO VILLAGECHUMOUKEDIMA, NAGALAND 2:UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS GOVT. OF INDIA TRANSPORT BHAWAN-1 PARLIAMENT STREET NEW DELHI-11000
Page No.# 2/4 Advocate for the Petitioner : T. B. JAMIR, Advocate for the Respondent : , Linked Case : Review.Pet./1/2025 STATE OF NAGALAND AND 3 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY GOVT. OF NAGALAND KOHIMA NAGALAND 2: COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY GOVT. OF NAGALAND DEPT. OF WORKS AND HOUSING GOVT. OF NAGALAND 3: ENGINEER-IN-CHIEF DEPT. OF WORKS AND HOUSING GOVT. OF NAGALAND KOHIMA NAGALAND 4: CHIEF ENGINEER PWD (NATIONAL HIGHWAYS) GOVT. OF NAGALAND KOHIMA NAGALAND VERSUS SHRI PHUSHITO AYEMI AND ANR R/O PHUSHITO VILLAGECHUMOUKEDIMA NAGALAND 2:UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS GOVT. OF INDIA TRANSPORT BHAWAN-1 PARLIAMENT STREET NEW DELHI-110001 ------------ Advocate for : T. B. JAMIR Advocate for : A. ZHIMOMI appearing for SHRI PHUSHITO AYEMI AND ANR
Page No.# 3/4 BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAKHETO SEMA HONBLE MR JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
ORDER 24.02.2025 (K. Sema, J) Mr. T.B. Jamir, learned counsel for the applicants and Mr. A. Zhimomi,
learned counsel for the opposite parties. In the course of hearing of the application Mr. T.B. Jamir, learned counsel for the applicants submits that he may be allowed to withdraw the present I.A. and the State may be allowed to file an application simpliciter for extension of time to comply with the Judgment dated 17.11.2021, passed by this Court in I.A.(Civil)/72/2021 in linked Case, PIL/3/2021. Mr. A. Zhimomi, learned counsel submits that if the intent of the State is only to file an application for extension of time to implement the
Judgment dated 17.11.2021 he has no objection provided specific time is granted to the applicants to implement the Judgment dated 17.11.2021. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the applicants, this Court allows the State/applicants to file application simpliciter for granting extension of time to implement the Judgment dated 17.11.2021, passed by this Court in I.A.(Civil)/7/2021 in linked Case, PIL/3/2021.
Page No.# 4/4 The application accordingly stands disposed.
JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant