Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23039 (GAU)

The State of Mizoram r/b the Chief Secy. to the Govt. of Mizoram and 8 Ors. v. In Re- Construction of Working Women Hostel at Vengthlang and Anr.

I.A.(Civil)/182/2025 · 2025-10-23

Michael Zothankhuma, Yarenjungla Longkumer

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC030006982025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/182/2025 The State of Mizoram r/b the Chief Secy. to the Govt. of Mizoram and 8 Ors. Aizawl, Mizoram. VERSUS In Re- Construction of Working Women Hostel at Vengthlang and Anr. Champhai, Mizoram. Advocate for the Petitioner : Addl. AG/GA, Mizoram Advocate for the Respondent : Mr A.R. Malhotra Linked Case : PIL(Suo Moto)/2/2025 In Re- Construction of Working Women Hostel at Vengthlang Champhai Mizoram. VERSUS 1. The State of Mizoram r/b the Chief Secretary and 9 Ors Aizawl Mizoram. 2:The Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram Public Works Dept. Aizawl. 3:The Engineer in Chief Page No.# 2/3 Public Works Dept. Govt. of Mizoram Aizawl. 4:The Chief Engineer Building Public Works Dept. Aizawl. 5:The Chief Architect Office of the Engineer-in-Chief Public Works Dept. Aizawl. 6:The Superintending Engineer Other Department Circle Public Works Dept. Laipuitlang Aizawl Mizoram. 7:The Executive Engineer Project Division-III Public Works Dept. Aizawl. 8:The Deputy Commissioner Champhai District-Champhai. 9:The Superintendent of Police Champhai District-Champhai. 10:R.Z. Construction R/b Richard Vanlaltanpuia Kawn Veng-II Zemabawk Aizawl Mizoram. Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr A.R. Malhotra Advocate for the Respondent : Addl. AG/GA Mizoram for R1 - R9 Page No.# 3/3 B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE YARENJUNGLA LONGKUMER ORDER 24.10.2025 M. Zothankhuma, J Mr. Samuel Vanlalhriata Chhangte, the learned Additional Advocate General, Mizoram, appearing for the applicants submits that in view of the filing of IA(C) 186/2025, he would like to withdraw this application. The prayer of the counsel for the applicants is allowed. IA is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant