Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23037 (BOM)

GOTIRAM RAGHUNATH MHASKE AND ANOTHER v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

CA/7520/2024 · 2025-01-17

Shri Mangesh S Patil, Shri Prafulla S Khubalkar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

913 CA NO. 7520 OF 2024.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7520 OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1077 OF 2021 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1077 OF 2021 GOTIRAM RAGHUNATH MHASKE AND ANOTHER VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Tushar Shinde h/f. Mr. Shinde Chandrakant K. AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 : Mr. A. V. Lavte Advocate for Respondent No. 4 : Mr. P. D. Salunke Advocate for Respondent No. 5 : Mr. S. Y. Mahajan Advocate for Respondent No. 6 : D. J. Choudhari ... CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL & PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR , JJ. DATE : 17.01.2025 PER COURT : 1. This is an application seeking amendment of the writ petition, which is still to be admitted, in the light of supervening event. 2. No prejudice is caused to any of the respondents in as much as the writ petition is still to be admitted. There would be every opportunity to each of them to file an additional affidavit, if they intend to contest the portion sought to be added by way of amendment. 1/2 2025:BHC-AUG:1554-DB 913 CA NO. 7520 OF 2024.odt 3. The civil application is allowed, amendment to be carried out within two weeks. The respondents shall be at liberty to file additional affidavits. 4. List the petition for admission on 28.03.2025. ( PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.) (MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) jhs/ 2/2