[2025:RJ-JP:31109] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8407/2025 Madanlal S/o Ramlal, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Baad Churiya, P.s. Niwai Sadar District Tonk (At Present Confined In District Jail, Tonk). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Praveen Kumar Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP with Mr. Shubham Kumar Sain, AAAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 11/08/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.113/2025 registered at Police Station Newai Sadar, District Tonk for the offence(s) under Sections 115(2) and 126(2) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the injuries sustained to injured Zalim Singh Meena was not opined to be dangerous to life. The concerned medical jurist has opined that if the petitioner would have not been treated on right time then the injury No.1 may be endanger to life. It is also contended that the petitioner is in custody since 08.05.2025 and charge-sheet has already been submitted and [2025:RJ-JP:31109] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-8407/2025] trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and contended that the injured Zalim Singh Meena sustained fracture of parietal bone apart from the 3 other injuries. The other injured also sustained injuries. It is direct allegation of causing injury is against the petitioner. It is also contended that the petitioner was also charge-sheeted under Sections 341 and 323 of IPC in FIR No.223/2024, therefore, considering the above facts, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be dismissed. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the nature of injuries sustained to injured Zalim Singh Meena at his head, I am not inclined to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Hence, the criminal misc. bail application of the accused- petitioner is dismissed. 7. The petitioner is free to move an application after recording of the statement of injured Zalim Singh Meena and the concerned Doctor, before the concerned competent Court. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/212