Page No.# 1/3 GAHC030006592024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/108/2024 Sh. Kala Chand Chakma and 4 Ors. S/o Maratya Chakma (L), R/o Ajasora-III, Lawngtlai District, Mizoram. 2: Smt. Chaya Rani Chakma W/o Baskar Chakma R/o Ajasora-III Lawngtlai District Mizoram. 3: Sh. Bangala Chakma S/o Kally Chakma (L) R/o Ajasora-III Lawngtlai District Mizoram. 4: Sh. Lokhi Dhan Chakma S/o Balabhadra Chakma (L) R/o Ajasora-III Lawngtlai District Mizoram. 5: Sh. Proti Lal Chakma S/o Dipankar Chakma (L) R/o Ajasora-III Lawngtlai District Mizoram VERSUS Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram, District Council and Minority Affairs Dept. and 5 Ors. Aizawl, Mizoram. 2:Chakma Autonomous District Council r/b the Executive Secretary Chakma Autonomous District Council Kamalanagar Page No.# 2/3 Lawngtlai District Mizoram. 3:The Executive Member i/c LAD through the Local Administration Officer Chakma Autonomous District Council Kamalanagar Lawngtlai District. 4:Sh. Bhaba Chandra Chakma S/o Tabu Dhan Chakma Vice President Ajasora-III Village Council R/o Ajasora III Lawngtlai District. 5:Sh. Maya Ranjan Chakma S/o Subal Chandra Nominated Member Ajasora-III Village Council. R/o Ajasora-III Lawngtlai District. 6:Sh. Borchoka Chakma S/o Sh. Tabu Dhan Chakma Caretaker Ajasora-III Village Council. R/o Ajasora-III Lawngtlai District Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr Ashok Kumar Rokhum Advocate for the Respondent : Addl. AG/GA, Mizoram for R1 B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO ORDER 08.04.2025 Heard Mr. A K Rokhum, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Benjamin Lalthlamuana, learned Government Advocate for the respondents. By filing this writ petition, the petitioners have challenged the Notification dated Page No.# 3/3 19.06.2024 (Annexure-7) by which, the Executive Body of Ajasora-III Village Council was placed under suspension for a period of 3 (three) months with immediate effect. The petitioners have also challenged the Notification dated 01.10.2024 (Annexure-9) by which, the suspension period of the said Village Council Executive Body has been extended for another 3 (three) months with immediate effect. At this stage, Mr. A K Rokhum, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the 3 (three) months’ extension of the suspension of the Executive Body of the Village Council has not only expired but in fact, fresh election was conducted on 12.03.2025. He, therefore, submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. Mr. Benjamin Lalthlamuana, learned Government Advocate agrees to the said submission. In view of above, the writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant