CRM-M-69566 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 126 RAVINDER KUMAR STATE OF CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: SURYA P 1. directions to against the respondents No. to the tune of Rs.16,20,000/ 2. petitioner P-5) before the present petition by issuing directions to the the abovementioned representation within a stipulated time. 3. 69566-2025 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH RAVINDER KUMAR VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA P Mr. B.D. Sharma, Advocate for SURYA PARTAP SINGH, J (ORAL) The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner directions to the respondents No.1 to 4 to the respondents No.5 to 8 for committing cheating with the petitioner to the tune of Rs.16,20,000/-. The learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed the representation ) before the respondent No.2. The learned counsel prays for disposing of the present petition by issuing directions to the the abovementioned representation within a stipulated time. Notice of motion to respondents No.1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-69566-2025 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 15.01.2026 .....PETITIONER VERSUS .....RESPONDENT SURYA PARTAP SINGH , Advocate for the petitioner. as been filed by the petitioner to conduct fair and impartial enquiry for committing cheating with the petitioner The learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that the filed the representation dated 11.11.2023 (Annexure . The learned counsel prays for disposing of the present petition by issuing directions to the respondent No.2 to decide the abovementioned representation within a stipulated time. to respondents No.1 to 4 only. (O&M) 15.01.2026 .....PETITIONER .....RESPONDENTS for conduct fair and impartial enquiry for committing cheating with the petitioner The learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that the (Annexure . The learned counsel prays for disposing of to decide VINOD KUMAR ARYA 2026.01.16 10:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-69566 hereby directed month from the date of receipt of this order, the representat (Annexure P Amritsar officer not below the rank of Deputy Commissioner of Police. It is however clarified that no finding is being returned, by this Court, with regard to merits of the contents of representation. The respondent No.2 shall be at liberty to representation of the petitioner and level. 6. Vinod Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 69566-2025 (O&M) 2 Keeping in view the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is hereby directed that by passing a speaking order within a period of one month from the date of receipt of this order, the representat (Annexure P-5) be disposed of either by the Commissioner of Police, (respondent No.2) or, on assignment by him officer not below the rank of Deputy Commissioner of Police. It is however clarified that no finding is being returned, by this Court, with regard to merits of the contents of representation. The respondent No.2 shall be at liberty to take an independent assessment with regard to contents of representation of the petitioner and take an independent decision at his own In view of above, the present petition is hereby disposed of. Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No Keeping in view the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is that by passing a speaking order within a period of one month from the date of receipt of this order, the representation of petitioners ) be disposed of either by the Commissioner of Police, (respondent No.2) or, on assignment by him, by any other police officer not below the rank of Deputy Commissioner of Police. It is however clarified that no finding is being returned, by this Court, with regard to merits of the contents of representation. The respondent No.2 shall be at an independent assessment with regard to contents of an independent decision at his own In view of above, the present petition is hereby disposed of. :Yes/No : Yes/No Keeping in view the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is that by passing a speaking order within a period of one ion of petitioners ) be disposed of either by the Commissioner of Police, , by any other police officer not below the rank of Deputy Commissioner of Police. It is however clarified that no finding is being returned, by this Court, with regard to merits of the contents of representation. The respondent No.2 shall be at an independent assessment with regard to contents of an independent decision at his own VINOD KUMAR ARYA 2026.01.16 10:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document