JITENDRA SINGH @ JEETU S/O SH. RAM SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/8370/2025 · 2025-09-01
Praveer Bhatnagar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23029 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23029 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:34937] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.8370/2025 Jitendra Singh @ Jeetu S/o Sh. Ram Singh, R/o Huldhani, Police Station Parbatsar, District Nagaur, Rajasthan (At Present Accused Petitioner Is Confined In District Jail, Neem Ka Thana). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Chain Singh Rathore, Adv. Mr. Shakti Singh, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order 01/09/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.18/2025, registered at Police Station Reengus, District Sikar, for the offence(s) under Sections 140(3), 310(2) and 311 of BNS.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is contended that the other similarly placed co-accused namely- Jagdish @ Jagga and Hariom @ Bhindi have already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 26.06.2025 and the case of the present petitioner is not distinguishable from those co-accused, who have already been enlarged on bail. It is further contended that the accused-petitioner is in custody since
[2025:RJ-JP:34937] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8370/2025] 17.02.2025, charge-sheet has already been submitted before the concerned Court and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the grant of bail application and contended that the petitioner along with other co-accused after abducting the complainant committed dacoity, therefore considering the nature of offence, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be dismissed.
4. Heard and perused the material available on the record.
5. Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner and taking note of the fact that the other similarly placed co-accused namely- Jagdish @ Jagga and Hariom @ Bhindi have already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court and the charge-sheet against the petitioner has already been submitted, the accused-petitioner is in custody since 17.02.2025 and further the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, this Court deems it proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused petitioner- Jitendra Singh @ Jeetu S/o Sh. Ram Singh, in connection with FIR No.18/2025, registered at Police Station Reengus, District Sikar, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his
[2025:RJ-JP:34937] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8370/2025] appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
7. The accused-petitioner is directed to mark his presence on 25th of every month before the concerned Police Station till conclusion of the trial. The SHO of the concerned Police Station is
directed to maintain a regular register marking the presence of the accused-petitioner and shall send the presence report of the accused-petitioner on the same day to the concerned trial Court every month without any delay. In case of any breach to the above condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court.
8. The accused-petitioner is also directed that to submit his present address along with the mobile number to the concerned S.H.O. and the concerned S.H.O. shall verify the said address and the mobile number.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-86