- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:9697 WP No. 18346 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 18346 OF 2013 (S-PRO) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. R. RAMESH KUMAR S/O. SRI. RAMALINGAM AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS FIRST DIVISION ASSISTANT NIRASHRITHARA PARIHARA KENDRA MAGADI MAIN ROAD BANGALORE-560091 2. SRI. K. RAME GOWDA S/O. LATE JAVARE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS FIRST DIVISION ASSISTANT NIRASHRITHARA PARIHARA KENDRA MAGADI MAIN ROAD BANGALORE-560091 3. SMT. H. PADMAVATHAMMA W/O. SRI. N. RAMESH AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS FIRST DIVISION ASSISTANT CENTRAL RELIEF COMMITTEE MAGADI ROAD BANGALORE-560091 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. B.S.KARTHIKEYAN, FOR SRI. K. HIRIYANNA., ADVOCATES) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:9697 WP No. 18346 of 2013 VIKASA SOUDHA BANAGALORE-560001 2. THE PRESIDENT/CHAIRMAN CENTRAL RELIEF COMMITTEE MAGADI ROAD BANGALORE-560091 3. CENTRAL RELIEF COMMITTEE MAGADI ROAD BANGALORE-560091 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.J.ESWARAPA, AGA FOR R1 TO R3) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 02.04.2013 VIDE ANNEXURE-H ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT AND FURTHER DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO ACCORD PROMOTION TO THE PETITIONERS TO THE CADRE OF SUPERINTENDENTS AS PER THE EXISTING 1990 CADRE AND RECRUITMENT RULES OF THE COMMITTEE WITH EFFECT FROM THE DATE THE SAID POSTS FELL VACANT WITH ALL CONSEQUENTIAL SERVICE AND MONETARY BENEFITS AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ ORAL ORDER Mr. B.S.Karthikeyan, learned counsel appearing for Mr. K.Hiryanna, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the writ petition may be dismissed as the same has - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:9697 WP No. 18346 of 2013 become infructuous and seeks liberty to avail any alternate remedy available to the petitioners. 2. His submission is noted and the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. If the petitioners are entitled to any remedy in view of the fresh rules framed, they may submit their representations. If such representations are filed, the respondents shall consider the same in accordance with law. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE HJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 40