- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:12798-DB WA No. 464 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T WRIT APPEAL No.464 OF 2022 (LA-BDA) BETWEEN: 1. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARAPARK WEST BENGALURU - 560 020. 2. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER (GIDADA KONENAHALLI IN-CHARGE) BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T CHOWDIAH ROAD KUMARAPARK WEST BENGALURU - 560 020. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI B VACHAN, ADVOCATE) AND: J RAMESH S/O JAYARAMAN C/O S.R. SUBBARAYULU No.6, VI MAIN, SAMPIGE LAYOUT VIJAYANANAGAR NORTH BENGALURU - 560 079. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI AVATHI RAVINDRANATH, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by MOUNESHWARAPPA NAGARATHNA Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:12798-DB WA No. 464 of 2022 THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT 1961 PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 29.03.2021 PASSED IN WP No.4180/2017 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE BY ALLOWING THE WRIT APPEAL AND DISMISS THE WRIT PETITION AND ETC., THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR and HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR) In this intra Court Appeal, appellants are challenging the Order passed by the learned single Judge on the writ side in W.P.No.4180/2017(LA-BDA) dated 29th March 2021. 2. Sri B.Vachan, learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo seeking permission for withdrawal of the present appeal. Therefore, the memo is taken on record. 3. Consequently, appellants are permitted to withdraw the appeal as is sought for. 4. Further, in consequence of disposal of this appeal in relation to the memo which has been filed by the learned counsel for the appellants, it is deemed appropriate to pass - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:12798-DB WA No. 464 of 2022 suitable orders that if any applications are pending for consideration, those applications are also to be disposed of, inclusive of I.A.No.3/2025 wherein the said application is filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking to condone the delay of 48 days in filing the appeal and I.A.No.4/2025 for stay. 5. Accordingly, those applications are also disposed of in terms of the memo filed by the learned counsel for the appellants. Ordered accordingly. Sd/- (K.SOMASHEKAR) JUDGE Sd/- (VENKATESH NAIK T) JUDGE kcm List No.: 2 Sl No.: 3