[2025:RJ-JP:31115] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8340/2025 Vikram Singh S/o Sh. Chandrabhan, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Mau, Police Station Mundawar, Dist. Khairthal-Tijara (Raj.) (At Present Petitioner Is Confined In Sub Jail Mundawar, Dist. Khairthal-Tijara (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Brahma Prakash For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP Mr. Shubham Kumar Sain, AAAG Mr. Ashvini Raj Tanwar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 11/08/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 198/2025 registered at Police Station Mundawar, District Khairthal-Tijara for the offences under Sections 109(1), 351(3) of BNS and Section 5/27 of Arms Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the injured Vishambhar Dayal and the petitioner have entered into compromise and injured has executed an agreement stating no objection regarding the grant of bail to the petitioner. It is also contended that the case was lodged due to misunderstanding with the petitioner. The petitioner did not use [2025:RJ-JP:31115] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-8340/2025] any fire arm, the injury sustained to injured at his frontal bone was opined to be grievous in nature. The petitioner and injured are close relatives. It is further contended that a cross-case was also filed by the petitioner party against the complainant and other persons and in which the charge-sheet was also submitted before the concerned Court. The accused-petitioner is in custody since long and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned counsel for the injured concedes that the injured Vishambhar Dayal has executed an affidavit, containing the fact that if petitioner's bail application is allowed then he has no objection. It is also contended that petitioner and injured are close relatives, therefore, if the bail application of the petitioner is allowed then the injured has no objection. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. Heard and perused the material available on record. 6. The allegations against the petitioner is of using fire arm and causing injury at the head of injured Vishmabhar Dayal. The injured sustained fracture of frontal-bone, the concerned medical jurist opined it to be dangerous to life. Therefore, considering the above facts, this court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 7. Accordingly, the present criminal misc. bail application is hereby dismissed. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J ashu /211