Sh. Lalrinkhuma v. The State of Mizoram r/b Chief Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram and 14 Ors.
WP(C)/122/2024 · 2025-03-20
Nelson Sailo
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23019 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23019 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC030007022024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/122/2024 Sh. Lalrinkhuma S/o Lawmzuala R/o Bungkawn, Aizawl District, Mizoram. VERSUS The State of Mizoram r/b Chief Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram and 14 Ors. Aizawl. 2:The District Magistrate Aizawl District Aizawl Mizoram. 3:The Secretary Home Dept. Govt. of Mizoram Aizawl. 4:The Superintendent of Police Aizawl District Govt. of Mizoram Aizawl. 5:The Officer-in-Charge Kulikawn Police Station Aizawl Mizoram. 6:The Chairman Bungkawn Local Council Aizawl Mizoram. 7:The Secretary Bungkawn Local Council
Page No.# 2/3 Aizawl Mizoram. 8:The President Young Mizo Association Bungkawn Branch Aizawl Mizoram. 9:The President Mizoram Upa Pawl Bungkawn Branch Aizawl Mizoram. 10:The President MHIP Bungkawn Branch Aizawl Mizoram. 11:The President Village Defence Party Bungkawn Aizawl Mizoram. 12:The President Tlangveng Welfare Organization Aizawl Mizoram. 13:The President Bungkawn Damveng Tangrual Pawl Bungkawn Aizawl Mizoram. 14:The President H/S Veng Tangrual Pawl Bungkawn Aizawl Mizoram. 15:Central YMA Kumpuan Sub-Committee R/b The Chairman Tuikhuahtlang Aizawl Mizoram
Page No.# 3/3 Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Jonathan Lalrintluanga Advocate for the Respondent : Addl. AG/GA, Mizoram for R1 - 5
ORDER B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO
21.03.2025 Mr. Jonathan Lalrintluanga, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has got the relief which he has sought for and therefore would not like to pursue the matter any further and withdraw the writ petition. Mr. Benjamin Lalthlamuana, learned Govt. Advocate appearing for the State respondents has no objection to the prayer. In view of above, the writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant