2025:JHHC:29214-DB Page | 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. A (D.B.) No. 1129 of 2025 --------- Md. Afroz, aged about 23 years, son of Md. Shah Alam, resident of village- Munger Hazratganj Chowk, P.O. & P.S. Kasimbazar, District- Munger (Bihar). … … Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Respondent --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ---------- For the Appellant : Mr. Ankit Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent : A.P.P. ----------- 02/Dated: 22nd September, 2025 I.A. No.12403 of 2025 1. This application has been preferred by the appellant for condoning a delay of 42 days in filing the appeal. Having been satisfied with the reasons assigned in the instant application, the same is allowed and a delay of 42 days in filing this appeal is hereby condoned. 2. I.A. No. 12403 of 2025 stands disposed of. In Cr. Appeal (DB)No.1129 of 2025 3. Heard Mr. Ankit Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant as well as learned A.P.P. 4. This application has been directed against the order dated 06.05.2025 passed in B.P. No. 248 of 2025 corresponding to Jamua P.S. Case No. 37 of 2025 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-VI, Giridih, whereby and whereunder the prayer for bail of the appellant has been rejected. 5. It has been alleged that the appellant was apprehended from a semi- constructed house and illegal gun-factory was found to be operative in the said house. 2025:JHHC:29214-DB 6. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant that similarly situated several co-accused persons have been granted bail by this Court in Cr.A(DB) No. 986 of 2025. Learned counsel submits that the appellant is in custody since 23.02.2025 7. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor though has opposed the prayer for bail of the appellant, but has not disputed the aforesaid facts. 8. Regard being had to the above, we while setting aside the order dated 06.05.2025 passed in B.P. No. 248 of 2025 arising out of Jamua P.S. Case No.37 of 2025 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-VI, Giridih, direct the appellant to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount, to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Giridih. 9. 8. Accordingly, this appeal stands allowed and disposed of. (Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.) (Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.) Amar/-