Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:17095 WP No. 11140 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 11140 OF 2025 (MV) BETWEEN:
SRI K MOHAN KRISHNAN, S/O KANNAN, AGED 55 YEARS, R/AT MALLANAYAKANAHALLI V & P TAYALUR, MULBAGAL TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT-563 136. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. LOKESH R., ADV.)
AND:
THE SECRETARY STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, TTMC "A" BLOCK, I FLOOR, K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BMTC BUILDINGS, BENGALURU-560 027. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. RAJKUMAR, AGA)
THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, DIRECTIONS TO THE RESPONDENT AUTHORITY TO TAKE DECISION IN RESPECT OF RENEWAL APPLICATION DATED 25.09.2023 MARKED ANNEXURE-B TO THE WRIT PETITION WITH IN 4 WEEKS FROM THE DATE OF RECEIPT OF THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE
ORDER IN THE ABOVE WRIT PETITION IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:17095 WP No. 11140 of 2025
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD
ORAL ORDER
The petitioner has a Stage Carriage Permit in No.69/1993-94 for the route between Alagonahalli to Panthanahalli and back. This permit has expired with effect from 21.10.2023, and the petitioner has filed his application for renewal on 26.09.2023. Mr. R. Lokesh, the learned counsel for the petitioner, relying upon these circumstances, submits that though the application in the prescribed form with the fee is paid, no action has been taken so far for
consideration of granting renewal.
Mr. Rajkumar, the learned Additional Government Advocate on instructions, submits that the application has been filed in the month of September 2023 without any follow up when the petitioner undoubtedly had to furnish the details of the vehicle and that the application would have been considered if the details of the vehicles are mentioned. Crucially, Mr. Rajkumar submits that if the petitioner files
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:17095 WP No. 11140 of 2025
the details of the vehicle in a time-bound manner, the application based on such details will be considered and the this outcome made known to the petitioner. In the light of these submissions, the following;
ORDER
The petition stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file, within four [4] weeks from today, the details of the vehicle along with a certified copy of this order with the respondent, directing the respondent to consider the same and communicate the outcome to the petitioner within the next eight [8] weeks.
It is needless to observe that this Court has not examined the merits of the petitioner's request for renewal and that must be considered by the respondent in accordance with law
RB Sd/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE