IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP Nos.13198 of 2025 and connected matters Decided on: 18.08.2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CWP No. 13198 of 2025 Kehar Singh …..Petitioner Versus HRTC & Anr .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. CWP No. 13200 of 2025 Kushal Singh …..Petitioner Versus HRTC & Anr .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. CWP No. 13208 of 2025 Rakesh Kumar …..Petitioner Versus HRTC & Anr .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate. 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 For the Respondents: Mr. Dheeraj K. Vashisht, Mr. Rahul Gathania and Mr. Rahul Thakur, Advocate, for the respondents in the respective petitions. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Dheeraj K. Vashisht, Mr. Rahul Gathania and Mr. Rahul Thakur, learned counsel, appear and waive service of notice on behalf of the respondents in the respective the petitions. 2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matters are heard at this stage. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have filed individual representations, annexed with the respective writ petitions, to the respondents for the redressal of the issues raised in these writ petitions, however, the representations preferred by them in light of settled legal position have not been adjudicated till date. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioners would be content in case the respondents /competent authority is directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representations in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule. Learned counsel for the respondents are not averse to this prayer. 4. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matters, these writ 3 petitions are disposed of with a direction to the respondent / competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioners. The writ petitions stand disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua August 18, 2025 Judge R.Atal