Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 229952 (MAD)

Shekar @ Sasi v. The District Collector

CMP(MD)/3784/2024 · 2025-11-11

Anita Sumanth, C Kumarappan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

C.M.P(MD)No.3784 of 2024 in W.A(MD)SR.No.14475 of 2024 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 11.11.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN C.M.P(MD)No.3784 of 2024 in W.A(MD)SR.No.14475 of 2024 Shekar @ Sasi ... Petitioner /Vs./ 1. The District Collector, O/o. Collectorate, Kanyakumari District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, O/o.The Superintendent of Police, Nagercoil,Kanyakumari District. 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Colachel Sub Division, Kanyakumari District. 4. The Inspector of Police, Karungal Police Station, Kanyakumari District. 5. Mohan ...Respondents 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.P(MD)No.3784 of 2024 in W.A(MD)SR.No.14475 of 2024 PRAYER in C.M.P(MD)No.3784 of 2024 :- Petition filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, to condone the delay of 321 days in filing the Appeal in WA(MD)Sr.No.14475 of 2024. PRAYER in W.A(MD)SR.No.14475 of 2024 :- Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, to call for the records relating to the order passed by this Court in WP(MD)No.4138 of 2023 dated 09.03.2023 and set aside the same and consequently allow this writ appeal. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Rajiv Rufus For Respondents : Mr.S.P.Maharajan (R1 to R4) Special Government Pleader Mr.Arun Jeyathram (R5) for Mr.H.Velavadhas ORDER (Order of the Court was made by DR.ANITA SUMANTH, J.) This is a petition seeking condonation of delay of 321 days in filing the writ appeal. 2. The petition for condonation of delay is absolutely bereft of any justification. In the affidavit, the petitioner states that the order was 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.P(MD)No.3784 of 2024 in W.A(MD)SR.No.14475 of 2024 passed on 09.03.2023, as against which, writ appeal was sought to be filed and certified copy was applied in time. Thereafter, he states, in vague and general terms that he had been suffering from medical ailments and financial crisis and hence, was unable to contact the counsel immediately. 3. We are not persuaded to condone the significant delay of 321 days on the mere ipse dixit of the petitioner, unsupported by any records whatsoever. 4. A detailed counter has also been filed objecting to the delay on the ground that no justification has been set out for the same, with which position we concur. Hence, this civil miscellaneous petition is dismissed in limine. Connected writ appeal is dismissed even at SR stage. No costs. [A.S.M.J.,] & [C.K.J.,] 11.11.2025 NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet :Yes sm 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.P(MD)No.3784 of 2024 in W.A(MD)SR.No.14475 of 2024 DR.ANITA SUMANTH, J. AND C.KUMARAPPAN,J. sm To 1. The District Collector, O/o. Collectorate, Kanyakumari District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, O/o.The Superintendent of Police, Nagercoil,Kanyakumari District. 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Colachel Sub Division, Kanyakumari District. 4. The Inspector of Police, Karungal Police Station, Kanyakumari District. C.M.P(MD)No.3784 of 2024 in W.A(MD)SR.No.14475 of 2024 11.11.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis