Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 229946 (MAD)

Kodanda v. The State of Tamilnadu

CRL OP(MD)/10903/2025 · 2025-10-24

S Srimathy

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP(MD). No.10903 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 24.10.2025 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY CRL OP(MD)No.10903 of 2025 and CRL MP(MD)No.8447 of 2025 1. Kodanda 2. Subramanian 3. Sindya ... Petitioners/ Accused Rank Not Known Versus The State of Tamilnadu, Rep by the Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch -II, Madurai City. (Crime No.Not Known of 2025) ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioners : Mr.D.Rameshkumar For Respondent : Mr.A.S.Abul Kalaam Azad Government Advocate (Crl. Side) For Intervenor : Mr.S.Sathya Chidambaram 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No.10903 of 2025 PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Cr.No.Not Known of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners/Accused, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420 and 506(ii) of IPC, in Crime No.Not Known of 2025, seek anticipatory bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant had lent money to the first petitioner on several occasions for the development of his business, and that petitioners 2 and 3 had also given assurance on behalf of the first petitioner for the repayment of the said loan amount. Hence, the complaint. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. Hence, he prays for grant of 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No.10903 of 2025 anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent Police submits that, by an earlier order dated 02.09.2025, this Court had directed the petitioners to appear before the Mediation Centre, however, they failed to appear. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, and since this Court had already granted an interim order directing the petitioners to appear before the Mediation Centre attached to this Court, but they failed to comply with the said direction, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition stands closed. (S S Y J) 24.10.2025 jbr 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No.10903 of 2025 To 1. The Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch -II, Madurai City. 2. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No.10903 of 2025 S.SRIMATHY,J. jbr ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.10903 of 2025 Date : 24.10.2025 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis