IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. v. RENU DEVI
CW/9852/2025 · 2025-07-08
Anil Kumar Upman
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22993 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22993 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:25551] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9852/2025 Iffco Tokio General Insurance Company Ltd., Through Manager Regional Office 101, First Floor, A.r.g. Corporate Park, Gopalbadi, Ajmer Road Flyover, Jaipur-302006, Now At Present Having Its Office At Second Floor, Bhagwati Bhawan, Government Hostel Crossing, Above P.l. Motors, Jaipur Through Its Constituted Attorney (Effective From 31.08.2020 To 30.08.2021) (Insurance Company Of Vehicle Tractor No. Rj-14-Rd-1944) ----Petitioner Versus
1. Renu Devi, Aged About 28 Years, W/o Late Shri Ramphool Sharma
2. Piyush Sharma, Aged About 11 Years, S/o Late Shri Ramphool Sharma
3. Ayush Sharma, Aged About 6 Years, S/o Late Shri Ramphool Sharma
4. Prem Devi, Aged About 52 Years, W/o Shri Ramavtar Sharma
5. Ramavtar Sharma S/o Shri Kanhaiya Lal Sharma, Aged About 53 Years, Claimant No. 2 And 3 Being Minors Through Their Natural Guardian And Mother Renu Devi, All R/o Baplavto Ki Dhani, Nayla, Tehsil Jamwaramgarh, District Jaipur.
6. Vishnu Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Ramkaran Sharma, R/o Village Booj, Tehsil Jamwaramgarh, District Jaipur (Driver Cum Owner Of Vehicle Tractor No. Rj-14-Rd-1944) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Virendra Agrawal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vikram Singh Solanki HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 08/07/2025 The instant writ petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioner-insurance company for quashing the impugned order
[2025:RJ-JP:25551] (2 of 2) [CW-9852/2025] dated 21.05.2025 passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal No.2, Jaipur whereby, an application filed by the petitioner for taking written statement on record has been rejected. Sh. Vikram Singh Solanki has put in appearance on behalf of the respondents-claimants. He does not oppose the prayer made in this writ petition. Since the prayer made in this writ petition is not opposed by the respondents-claimants, in the interest of justice, the writ petition is allowed. Accordingly, the impugned order dated 21.05.2025 is quashed and set aside, the written statement filed by the petitioner-insurance company is ordered to be taken on record.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J GAUTAM JAIN /312