IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (C). No. 706 of 2024 ---------- 1. Suchita Sharma, w/o. Shri Rajiv Sharma, resident of Lajpat Nagar, Pundag, P.O. Pundag, P.S. Jagannathpur, Dist. Ranchi. 2. Archana Kumari, w/o. Shri Surya Bhushan, resident of House No. 238, Gitilpiri, Press Gali, Hatia Station Road, Ranchi, P.O. Hatia, P.S. Jagannathpur, Dist. Ranchi.. … … Petitioner - V E R S U S – 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Shri Badal Raj, District Superintendent of Education, Ranchi, Combined Building, PO GPO, P.S. Kotwali, Town and Dist. Ranchi. …….. Opp. Parties. CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S.N.PATHAK For the Petitioner : Ms. Neha Bhardwaj, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : Mr. Faisal Allam, AC to SC(M)-III ---------- 03/ 13.01.2025 Heard the parties. It has been very fairly submitted by learned counsel for the opposite parties that the order of this Court has already been complied with and in compliance thereof reasoned order has been passed. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not object to the same. In view of fair submission of learned counsel for the parties, no contempt is made out against the opposite parties and hence, the same is dropped. Resultantly, the instant contempt petition stands disposed of. However, petitioner is at liberty to challenge the reasoned order, if at all aggrieved by the same. (Dr. S.N. Pathak, J.) kunal