PINTU PRASAD KUSHWAHA ALIAS PINTU KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./6141/2024 · 2025-06-19
Sri Ananda Sen
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22986 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22986 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:16092
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 6141 of 2024
1. Pintu Prasad Kushwaha @ Pintu Kumar, S/o Kouleshwar Mahto, R/o Village Id, PO: Shila, PS: Semariya, District Chatra, Jharkhand,
825401.
2. Bipin Kumar, S/o Ramnath Mahto, R/o Ward No. 3, Sandh, PO: Sandh, PS Barka Gaon, District Hazaribagh, Jharkhand,825311. ….. Petitioner (s)
Versus The State of Jharkhand ….OP(s).
CORAM :
SRI ANANDA SEN, J.
------
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. J. K. Mishra, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, PP
-----
05/19.06.2025: This is an application filed by the petitioners praying for grant of anticipatory bail in terms of sections 482 and 484 of Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, as the petitioners have been allegedly implicated in connection with Korrah PS Case No. 74 of 2024 for the offences punishable under sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of learned ACJM, Hazaribag.
2.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the State.
3.
The learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.
4.
The petitioners are said to be Directors and HR of a company, namely, Stremax Consultants Private Limited, Hazaribag. It is alleged that they have published advertisement and started recruiting skilled staff for private sectors and NGOs on behalf of National Crime Research and Intelligence Bureau. Money were taken from several persons and they also attended the training thereafter it was found that the entire process was fake.
5.
Considering the allegation that fake process was initiated by these petitioners and they claimed that they are doing it on behalf of National Crime Research and Intelligence Bureau, I do not find this case fit for grant of anticipatory bail.
6.
Hence, the present anticipatory bail application is dismissed.
(ANANDA SEN, J. ) KNR/