Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22985 (KAR)

SRI MADHU R K v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/4775/2022 · 2025-07-07

J M Khazi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24343 CRL.P No. 4775 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 4775 OF 2022 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. SRI MADHU R K S/O KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/AT NO.09, 11TH CROSS, SHARADAMBHA SCHOOL ROAD, RAJARAJESHWARI NAGAR, BENGALURU-562160 2. GAGAN @ THEERTHA KUMAR S S/O SHIVAPRAKASH S, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/AT NO.117, 6TH CROSS, MOODALAPALYA, PRIYADARSHINI LAYOUT, BENGALURU-560072 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. HANUMESH H N, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY SUBRAMANYAPURA P S, REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDING, BANGALORE-560001 Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24343 CRL.P No. 4775 of 2022 2. MRS BHAVANA S D/O SIDDALINGAPPA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, NO.24, 4TH CROSS, 7TH MAIN, BHAGIRATHINAGARA, BSK 3RD STAGE, BENGALURU CITY, KARNATAKA-560085 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.VINAY MAHADEVAIAH, HCGP FOR R1; SRI.K.N.SHASHIDHAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR AGAINST THE CR.NO.116/2022 DATED 20.04.2022 ON THE FILE OF SUBRAMANYAPURA POLICE STATION FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 354D, 506, 341, 504, 307 R/W 34 OF IPC, PENDING BEFORE THE II ADDL.C.M.M., BENGALURU AND ALLOW THIS CRL.P. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the petition as not pressed with liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh petition. 2. The aforesaid memo is place on record. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24343 CRL.P No. 4775 of 2022 3. In the light of the memo, petition is dismissed as not pressed, with liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh petition, if so permissible under law. 4. In view of disposal of petition, pending application/s, if any, stands disposed off, as no separate order is required. SD/- (J.M.KHAZI) JUDGE ASN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19