Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22985 (JHR)

BHANU PRATAP YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

W.P.(Cr.)/651/2024 · 2025-03-20

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (Cr). No.651 of 2024 ------ 1. Bhanu Pratap Yadav, Son of Late Vindhyachal Yadav, aged about 57 years, resident of Ravi Medical, Yadav Complex, Block Chowk, P.O. & P.S.-Ramgarh, Dist.-Ramgarh 2. Shashi Kumar, Son of Bhanu Pratap Yadav, aged about 27 years, resident of Ravi Medical, Yadav Complex, Block Chowk, P.O. & P.S.- Ramgarh, Dist.-Ramgarh 3. Gudiya Devi @ Guddi Devi, Wife of Bhanu Pratap Yadav, aged about 52 years, resident of Ravi Medical, Yadav Complex, Block Chowk, P.O. & P.S.-Ramgarh, Dist.- Ramgarh 4. Rinku Kumari, Daughter of Bhanu Pratap Yadav, aged about 32 years, resident of Ravi Medical, Yadav Complex, Block Chowk, P.O. & P.S.-Ramgarh, Dist.-Ramgarh .... .... …. Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Subodh Yadav, Son of Late Baleshwar Yadav, aged about 49 years, Resident of Village-Padma, P.O. & P.S.-Padma, District- Hazaribagh .... .... .... Respondents ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Prashant Pallav, Advocate Ms. Smita Sinha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Jai Prakash, AAG IA Ms. Ruchi Mukti, AC to AAG IA For the Resp. No.2 : Mr. Gautam Kumar, Advocate Ms. Savita Kumari, Advocate ------ Order No.07 Dated- 20-03-2025 Heard the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this W.P. (Cr.) with liberty to file a Cr.M.P. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, this W.P. (Cr.) stands dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. The certified copy of the documents filed, may be substituted with their photocopies. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/