Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22984 (JHR)

RAJGIRI PASWAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./4503/2025 · 2025-08-18

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:24010 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 4503 of 2025 1. Rajgiri Paswan, age about 32 years, son of Sri Ram Prasad Ram 2. Raju Paswan, age about 25 years, son of Sri Ram Prasad Ram 3. Amrendra Paswan, age about 27 years, son of Sri Ram Prasad Ram 4. Ram Prasad Ram, age about 58 years, son of late Mana Ram All are resident of village Bihari Bigha, P.O. Darua, P.S. Hussainabad, District-Palamau. ...... … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioners :Mr. Manoj Kr. No. 2, Advocate For the State : Mr. Satish Prasad, A.P.P 02/ 18.08.2025: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Hussainabad P.S. Case No. 118/2025, registered under sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 352, 3 (5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the Court of learned S.D.J.M Palamau at Daltonganj. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there is case and counter case between the parties and first case has been lodged on the side of petitioners being Hussainabad P.S. Case No. 115 of 2025 and after four days present case has been lodged against the petitioners. On these grounds, he submits that the petitioners may kindly be provided privilege of anticipatory bail. 4. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer and submits that allegations of assault are there. 5. On perusal of F.I.R. it transpires that there is direct allegation of assault against the petitioner no.2 upon the head of informant. In view of that I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner no.2. Accordingly, the prayer of anticipatory bail on behalf of petitioner no.2 namely, Raju Paswan, is hereby rejected. 5. So far prayer of bail on behalf of petitioner nos. 1, 3 and 4 are concerned, there is general and omnibus allegation against them, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner nos. 1, 3 and 4. Accordingly, the petitioner nos. 1, 3 and 4 are directed to surrender before the learned court within three weeks from today and in the event of their surrender / arrest, the petitioner nos. 1, 3 and 4 shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M Palamau at Daltonganj, in connection with Hussainabad P.S. Case No. 118/2025, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of B.N.S.S, 2023. ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-