- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:15069 WP No. 10277 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO. 10277 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: VENKATARAVANAPPA S/O LATE THIMMANNA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS OCC: AGRICULTURIST BANDEKOTE VILLAGE MURUGAMALAL HOBLI CHINTAMANI TALUK CHIKKABALLAPURA DIST-562 102. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. HANUMANTHAPPA HARAVIGOWDAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA M.S. BUILDING, B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDI BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT CHIKKABALLAPURA-562 102. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER CHIKKABALLAPURA SUB DIVISION CHIKKABALLAPURA-562 10. Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:15069 WP No. 10277 of 2025 4. THE TAHASILDHAR CHINTHAMANI TALUK CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT-562 102. 5. THE REVENUE INSPECTOR MURUGAMALLA HOBLI CHINTAMANI TALUK CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRCIT-562 102. 6. THE VILLAGE ACCOUNTANT BANDAKOTE REVENUE CIRCLE MURUGAMALLA HOBLI, CHINTAMANI TALUK CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT-562 102. 7. VENKATESHAPPA S/O LATE THIMMANNA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/AT BANDAKOTE VILLAGE MINDIGALLU PANCHAYATH MURUGAMALLA HOBLI, CHINTAMANI TALUK CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT-562 102. 8. SRI. RAGHAVENDRA A S/O LATE Y.N.ACHAIAH AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS R/AT BATHALAHALLI VILLAGE MURUGAMALLA HOBLI CHINTAMANI TALUK CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT-562 102. 9. N. VENKATARAMANA NAYAK S/O LATE M.NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS R/AT HIMARAKUNTE VILLAGE RONURU HOBALI SRINIVASAPURA TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT-562 125. 10. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:15069 WP No. 10277 of 2025 CHINTAMANI TALUK CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT-562 102. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. V. SHIVA REDDY, AGA FOR R1 TO R6 AND R10) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENDORSEMENT DATED 05.03.2025 ISSUED BY THE 10TH RESPONDENT VIDE ANNEXURE-S, DIRECT THE 10TH RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE STATEMENT OF OBJECTION FILED BY THE PETITIONER VIDE ANNEXURE-T AND U DATED 24.02.2025 AND 28.03.2025 RESPECTIVELY AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA ORAL ORDER 1. The petitioner is aggrieved by an endorsement given by the ADLR by which he has taken note of the fact that the petitioner has filed objections to the proposed survey and has called upon the petitioner to produce any documents in support of his objection within a week, failing which steps would be taken in accordance with law. 2. If the petitioner has any objection to the survey (as evidenced by a copy of Annexure-T), it is obvious - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:15069 WP No. 10277 of 2025 that ADLR will take note of said objections before he decides to conduct the survey. There is, therefore, no justification for entertaining the writ petition against an endorsement by which the petitioner has been called upon to produce the documents. 3. However, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to contend that an attempt was being made to erect the boundary stone, despite the fact that the Deputy Commissioner has set aside the order of mutation passed in favour of the contesting private respondents and this is causing him grave prejudice. 4. A perusal of the objections filed by the petitioner would indicate that the petitioner is already before the Civil Court in O.S.No.296/2023 against the private respondents seeking a decree of injunction. It is needless to state that if there is any interference with the possession of the petitioner, it would be open for him to seek appropriate interim order in the aforementioned suit. - 5 - NC: 2025:KHC:15069 WP No. 10277 of 2025 5. Subject to the above observations, the writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- (N S SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE PKS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 54