APHC010324202014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] FRIDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2027/2014 Between: 1. BOYI APPARAO, VISAKHAPATNAM.,, S/O. SRI BOYI (LATE) CHINNAYYA, R/O. D.NO. 38-19-107/1, GOWTHAMI GARDENS, MARRIPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SMT BOYI AMARAVATHI EG DT ANR REP PP, W/O. SRI BOYI APPARAO, R/O. C/O. BORA VEERA VENKATA GIRI REDDY, D.NO. 2-50, RAGHAVENDRA COLONY, NEAR WATER TANK, BOMMURU, RAJAHMUNDRY, E.G.DISTRICT. 2. THE STATE OF AP, REPT. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF AP., HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toto call for the records from the file of the Judge Addl. Family Court at Visakhapatnam in O.P.No. 1351 of 2012. IA NO: 1 OF 2014(CRLRCMP 3270 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the certified copy of the order passed by the Judge, Addl. Family Court at Visakhapatnam in O.P.No. 1351 of 2012 dated 04-8-2014 as the certified copy of the common order was filed in Family Court appeal filed by the petitioner against OP.No. 233 of 2010 before this Hon'ble Court and the Xerox copy of the common order is filed herewith. IA NO: 2 OF 2014(CRLRCMP 3344 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the operatin of order passed by the Judge Addl. Family Court at Visakhapatnam in OP.No.1351/2012 dated 04.08.2014 pending disposal of the Crl.RC Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N (P) ANJANA DEVI SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. JITHENDER RAO VEERAMALLA 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following Order: The learned counsel for Respondent No.1 submits that the maintenance dispute in between the petitioner and Respondent No.1 has been settled out of the Court and requests to dismiss the Criminal Revision Case as infructuous. 2. In view of the above reasons, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 04.07.2025 TM 85 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.2027 of 2014 Date: 04.07.2025 TM