- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19069 RFA No. 342 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 342 OF 2017 (INJ) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. K.N.ANBARASAN AGE 58 YEARS, S/O NATARAJAN, R/O NO.324, 9TH 'D' MAIN ROAD, HRBR 1ST STAGE, BENGALURU. 2. SRI.P.M.RAJARAJAN AGE 50 YEARS, S/O MURGAAIYAN, R/O NO.34, 6TH MAIN, BANASWADI ROAD, BANASWADI, BENGALURU-560 043. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. SUBRAMANYAM.K., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. K.P.SUDHINDRA REDDY AGE 49 YEARS, S/O LATE PAPANNA, R/O NO.1828, 14TH CROSS, 23RD MAIN, 1ST SECTOR, HSR LAYOUT, BENGALURU-560 002. 2. S.CHANDRA SHEKAR AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, S/O SIVA, R/O NO.28, 5TH CROSS, BAZAAR STREET, NEELASANDRA, BENGALURU-560 047. 3. SRI.ASHOK KUMAR GANGARAM AGE 50 YEARS, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19069 RFA No. 342 of 2017 S/O SRI. GANGARAM THAKUMAL NO.521, 3RD CROSS, 17TH MAIN, 5TH BLOCK, BANGALORE-560 095. 4. GANGARAM THAKUMAL AGE 78 YEARS, S/O THAKUMAL, NO.521, 3RD CROSS, 17TH MAIN, 5TH BLOCK, BANGALORE-560 095. 5. CHENGALA RAYAN, MAJOR BY AGE, S/O MUNISWAMY, R/O NO.48, ITC COLONY, JEEVANAHALLI COX TOWN, BENGALURU-560 005. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. V.B.SHIVAKUMAR., ADVOCATE FOR C/R1; R2 TO 5-DISPENSED WITH V/O DATED:01.03.2017) THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 AND 105 READ WITH ORDER XLI-A OF THE CPC, 1908. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED AS UNDER: ORAL JUDGMENT When the case is called, the appellants are not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed on 03.06.2025, on that day, when the matter is called, there was no representation on behalf of the appellants, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19069 RFA No. 342 of 2017 either personally or through video conferencing. Hence, for appearance of counsel for the appellants it was ordered to be listed on 05.06.2025. The appeal is listed today for appearance of counsel of the appellants. As already noted above, when the case is called, the appellants are not represented. It appears that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the Regular First Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17