1 HN, J W.P.No.16441_2025 APHC010324162025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 16441/2025 Between: 1. Y V S BHARAT RAO, S/O Y V S VENKATA RAMANA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, D.NO.3-633, PEERLA CHAVADI STREET, SRIKALAHASTI, GST CENTRE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRI. SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SRIKALAHASTI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, SRIKALAHASTI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 4. M CHANDRA MOULI, S/O M. ANJENEYALU NAIDU R/O. NEAR POLAERI AMMA TEMPLE, VENKATAGIRI - 524132 5. GAVINI NAGA SHANKAR, S/O GAVINI SIVAIAH, R/O. GAVINI VARI PALEM, BESIDE POST, CHIRALA MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT - 523166. 6. SHAIK MOHAMMED RAFI, S/O SHAIK HUSEN SAHIB, R/O. D. NO 1- 84 THAKKELAPADU, NEAR MEDARAMETIA, PANGALUR POST, 2 HN, J W.P.No.16441_2025 PRAKASAM DISTRICT - 523213. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, the declaring inaction of the respondent no. 3 not consider the petitioner representation dated 16-04- 2025 according to law as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently this Hon'ble Court to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner representation dated 16-04-2025 stated supra and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner representation dated 16-04-2025 stated supra and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P B REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 HN, J W.P.No.16441_2025 The Court made the following Order: 1. Heard. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent No.3 is not acting on the representation of the petitioner, dated 16.04.2025. 3. The learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the Home submits that the petitioner’s representations dated 16.04.2025 will be considered by the respondents, as per the law. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to disposed off the Writ Petition at the stage of admission itself, directing the respondent No.3 to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 16.04.2025, in accordance with law and as per the procedure contemplated under Section 173(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, (for short, “BNSS”). As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 04.07.2025 NKA 4 HN, J W.P.No.16441_2025 277 HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N Writ Petition No.16441 of 2025 Date: 04.07.2025 NKA