Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 229747 (MAD)

Umapathy v. State Rep by The Sub inspector of Police

CRL OP/28906/2025 · 2025-10-25

K Rajasekar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 28906 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 25-10-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR CRL OP No. 28906 of 2025 Umapathy Petitioner(s) Vs State Rep by The Sub inspector of Police Cheyyar Police Station, Tiruvannamalai. Respondent(s) PRAYER Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, to enlarge the petitioner on Anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in connection with Crime No.406 of 2025 on the file of respondent police and thus render justice. For Petitioner: Mr.Srinath Rubart For Respondent(s): Public Prosecutor ORDER https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 28906 of 2025 The petitioner herein apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 21(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulations) Act, 1957, in Crime No.406 of 2025, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.This is the second anticipatory bail application. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner had illegally quarried 9 cubic meters of gravel in a lorry from public place. Hence, the case. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and has been falsely implicated in this case. The petitioner is ready and willing to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, on the ground that investigation is pending. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and opposed the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5.Considering the gravity of the offences, and though vehicles seized, quantity involved is very high, and the petitioner damaged the ecology, if granted bail they will indulge in similar offences, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners and there is no change in circumstances of the case. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 28906 of 2025 5.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 25-10-2025 gbi Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 28906 of 2025 To 1.State Rep by The Sub inspector of Police Cheyyar Police Station, Tiruvannamalai. 2.The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 28906 of 2025 K.RAJASEKAR J. gbi CRL OP No. 28906 of 2025 25-10-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis