Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:32737] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8319/2025 Rahul S/o Nandkishore, Resident Of Barigha Thana Ghannoli Mode, District Bharatpur. (At Present In District Jail, Dholpur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dushyant Jain, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order 20/08/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.189/2023, registered at Police Station Kanchanpur, District Dholpur, for the offence(s) under Sections 143, 456, 427, 336, 504 and 506 of IPC later on converted to Sections 147, 149, 458, 427, 336, 504, 506 and 307 of IPC.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is contended that no firearm was recovered from instance of petitioner, the petitioner is not having any criminal antecedents and the accused- petitioner is in custody since 17.06.2025. It is further contended that nobody received any injuries from the alleged firearm. It is argued that the other similarly placed co-accused namely,
[2025:RJ-JP:32737] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8319/2025] Mahaveer, Pawan and Samundra have already been enlarged on bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court by different orders and the case of the present petitioner is not distinguishable from the other co-accused, who have already been enlarged on bail, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the grant of bail application. It is contended that the accused-petitioner along with other co-accused after trespassing the house of the complainant abused her and also fired at the complainant and damaged his Jeep, therefore, the bail application of the accused- petitioner may be dismissed.
4. Heard and perused the material available on the record.
5. The other co-accused namely, Mahaveer, Pawan and Samundra have already been enlarged on bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court by different orders and the case of the present petitioner is not distinguishable from that of the other co-accused, who have already been enlarged on bail, there is no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner and nobody received any firearm injury therefore, without expressing anything on the merits of the case, this Court deems it proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused petitioner- Rahul S/o Nandkishore, in connection with FIR No.189/2023, registered at Police Station Kanchanpur, District Dholpur, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before
[2025:RJ-JP:32737] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8319/2025] the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-157