Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22967 (CHH)

KRANTI MARAWI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH,

WPS/4293/2021 · 2025-07-23

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:35989 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4293 of 2021 * - Kranti Marawi W/o Mukesh Marawi Aged About 32 Years R/o. Ward No. 15, Block Colony, Gharghoda, Pincode - 496111, Upper Story Of Post Office, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through - The Secretary, Agricultural (Animal Husbandry Department), Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Director, Veterinary Service, New Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Deputy Director, Veterinary Service, Raigarh, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : None appeared, even in two rounds For Respondents/State : Mr. Vedant Shadangi, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 24/07/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- 10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authority to grant of compassionate appointment to the petitioner. 10.2 That this court may kindly direct the respondent authority to pay appropriate compensation for the hardship suffered by the petitioner and her family due to the delay caused by the respondent authority. 10.3 Any other relief, which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper, may also be passed in favour of the petitioner together with cost of the petition. Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI Date: 2025.07.29 12:07:22 +0530 2 2. Mr. Vedant Shadangi, learned Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents would submit that on account of pendency of WPS No. 4441/2022, the claim of the petitioner for grant of compassionate appointment could not be decided. He would submit that as writ petition has already been disposed in favour of the husband of the petitioner, therefore, the authorities concerned are free to take decision on the application moved by the petitioner for grant of compassionate appointment. 3. Taking into consideration the submission made by Mr. Vedant Shadangi, respondents No. 2 and 3 are directed to consider the application moved by the petitioner dated 23.07.2021 for grant of compassionate appointment strictly in accordance with law preferably within a period of 120 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 4. With the aforesaid direction(s)/observation(s), the petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti