{1} 69 sr.no..odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13322 OF 2024 IN FAST/19656/2024 Suryakant Jalba Langote And Anr ….Applicant VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra Through The District Collector Nanded And Ors. …..Respondent ….. Advocate for Applicant : Mr. S.M.kakde And D.M.kakade AGP for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 : Mr. V.S. Badakh. CORAM : S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. DATE : 5th MAY, 2025. P.C. :- 1. Heard Mr. Kakade, learned advocate for applicants. The applicants are litigating for getting just compensation for their acquired land. Their Reference was partly allowed. They seek to file appeal for further enhancement of compensation. 2. Learned AGP for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 oppose the application. Respondent No.3 although served failed to appear. 3. Considering the contents of application and reasons stated therein and the law laid down by the Supreme Court of India in case of Suresh Kumar vs. State of Haryana and others in SLP © No. 670 of 2020, sufficient cause is made out to condone the delay. The application is allowed subject to condition that the applicant files an undertaking to the satisfaction of Registrar (Judicial) of this Court to the effect that he shall not claim interest and statutory benefits for the delayed period, within a period of eight weeks from today. Delay of 783 days caused in filing the appeal is condoned. Appeal be registered. [S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.] grt/-