IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 13221 of 2025 Decided on 19th August 2025 Sh. Hardyal Singh …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Ms. Shikha Chauhan, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice confined to respondents No.1 to 5. As no order adverse to the interest of respondent No.6 is being passed, therefore, no notice is being issued to the said respondent. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that in terms of Annexure P-1 the petitioner has highlighted the illegalities committed by respondent No.6 to the authorities concerned, however, the authorities have not dealt with the matter till date. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the interest of 2 justice would be served in the case at this stage if this petition is disposed of with the direction that the complaint filed by the petition be taken to its logical conclusion within some reasonable time. 3. In light of the prayer so made this petition is disposed of with the direction that let the complaint filed by the petitioner be taken to its logical conclusion, in accordance with law by adhering to the principles of natural justice within three months from today. It is clarified that this Court has not made any observation on the correctness of the contents of the complaint filed by the petitioner. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge August 19, 2025 (Vinod)