Sk. Abdul Jaleel v. The Andhra Pradesh Central Power Distribution Company Ltd.
WP/14726/2018 · 2025-03-07
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22962 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22962 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010323572018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
WRIT PETITION No. 14726 of 2018 Between: Sk. Abdul Jaleel ...PETITIONER AND The Andhra Pradesh Central Power Distribution Company Ltd and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. M PARAMESWARA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL)
2. Venkata Rama Rao Kota SC FOR APSPDCL
3. V V SATISH
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief:
“.... to cal for the records relating to the Proceedings of the 1st respondent vide impugned proceedings bearing Memo No.GM/Per/ASPer/PO(DC-I)/115- C3/2007-4, dated 3.1.2008 and Proceedings of the 2nd respondent vide Memo NoCMD/CGM/(HRD)/JS/GM/DGM(DC)/PO(DC)JPOA5/F.No.95-TP/D.No.239/18, dated 03.02.018 and quash the same by declaring the same as illegal arbitrary contrary to Rules and also unconstitutional being violative of Articles 14 16 and 21 of Constitution of India apart from void abinitio and also well known principles of natural justice and consequently, direct the respondents to consider to treat the entire period of leave to issuance of posting orders as on duty by conferring all consequential benefits on perusing the material on records as otherwise the petitioner will be put to heavy and irreparable loss..”
2
2. The earlier Docket Proceedings would show that none represented for the Petitioner and the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption
“For Dismissal”.
3. Despite the matter being listed under the caption “For dismissal”, none represented for the Petitioner today.
4. Learned Standing Counsel for respondent-APSPDCL is in attendance.
5. In that view, the Criminal Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/*
3
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Writ Petition No. 14726 of 2018
07.03.2025
Mjl /*