Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 229607 (MAD)

C.SANJEEVI v. State represented by

CRL RC/2158/2025 · 2025-10-28

T V Thamilselvi

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL RC No. 2158 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09-03-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI CRL RC No. 2158 of 2025 1. C.Sanjeevi S/o.Chinnasamy, Representing for M/s.Srinidhi Enterprises, 63, Pillaiyar Kovil Street, Paravai, Madurai - 625 402. (Appointed as Interim Resolution Professional As per order in CP (IB)/261 (CHE)/2024 dated 04.04.2025 before the NCLT-I, Chennai) Petitioner(s) Vs 1. State represented by Inspector of Police, Team-4, EDF-II, CCB-1, Vepery, Chennai. Crime No.56 of 20 2.Dhandapani No.3/5, JJ Nagar, Dindugal Main Road, Salaiputhur, Oddanchatram, Dindigul District. 3.Anguraj Representing for M/s.Srinidhi Enterprises as Directors All are residing at No.3/5, JJ Nagar, Dindugal Main Road, Salaiputhur, Oddanchatram, Dindigul District. Respondent(s) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL RC No. 2158 of 2025 CRL RC No. 2158 of 2025 PRAYER To call for the records and set aside the order dated 09.09.22025 passed in Crl.MP.9157/2025 in Cr.No.56/2024 by the Learned Metropolitan Magistrate for Exclusive Trial of CCB Cases and CBCID Metro Cases, Egmore, and pass such further or other orders at this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and thus render justice. CRL RC No. 2158 of 2025 For Petitioner(s): A.Praveen Kumar M.Meenatchi For Respondent(s): Mr. J. Subbiah, Government Advocate (Crl. side) ORDER This case is listed under the caption for ‘being mentioned’ at the instance of petitioner’s counsel. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits the petitioner was appointed by NCLT as Interim Resolution Professional. This court by an order dated 28.10.2025, directed the Trial Court to hand over the car to the petitioner. But, when the petitioner approached the Trial Court for take over the car, the Trial Court insisted the petitioner to execute the surety. The petitioner is Interim Resolution Professional not an accused and this case is not like other cases. Hence, he prays to give directions to the Trial Court to hand over car without insisting for sureties. 3. The duty is cast upon the petitioner to take over the properties and hand over to NCLT. Hence, the Trial Court is directed to permit the petitioner to take https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL RC No. 2158 of 2025 over the car without any surety. After handing over the car to NCLT, the petitioner is directed to produce the copy of the proceedings to the Trial Court. 09-03-2026 pbl Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No To The Metropolitan Magistrate for Exclusive Trial of CCB Cases and CBCID Metro Cases, Egmore. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL RC No. 2158 of 2025 T.V.THAMILSELVI J. pbl CRL RC No. 2158 of 2025 09-03-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis