Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2296 (GAU)

BONI AMIN BARBHUYAN AND 2 ORS v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS

WP(C)/6814/2025 · 2026-01-26

Soumitra Saikia

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010261392025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/6814/2025 BONI AMIN BARBHUYAN AND 2 ORS SON OF LATE ABDUL KADIR BARBHUYAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE RATANPUR II PS AND DISTRICT HAILAKANDI 2: SALIM UDDIN BARBHUYAN SON OF LATE ABDUL MANAN BARBHUYAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE RATANPUR II PS AND DISTRICT HAILAKANDI 3: ALIMUDDIN BARBHUYAN SON OF LATE MUJAMIL ALI BARBHUYAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE RATANPUR II PS AND DISTRICT HAILAKAND VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY GOVT OF ASSAM DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE AND DIGESTER MANAGEMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI 2:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER HAILAKANDI 3:THE CIRCLE OFFICER HAILAKANDI REVENUE CIRCLE HAILAKANDI 4:THE SETTLEMENT OFFICER HAILAKANDI 5:THE PRESIDENT SECRETARY MADRASA AND MASJID COMMITTEE RATANPUR HAILAKAND Advocate for the Petitioner : KAUSHIK JAIN, P LHAMU,MS A M DCOSTA,MR. P BORAH,K BHARALI,MR. S HAZARIKA,MR B KAUSHIK,MR H I CHOUDHURY Page No.# 2/2 Advocate for the Respondent : SC, REVENUE, GA, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA ORDER 27.01 .2026 Mr. P. Lhamu, learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions submits that the petitioner does not wish to press the writ petition any further. He therefore, seeks liberty to withdraw the same. 2. Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed on withdrawal with liberty. 3. Interim order, if any stands vacated. 4. Pending Interlocutory Application, if any is also dismissed. 5. Ms. G. Hazarika, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue Department appears for the respondent No.1; and Ms. M. Barman, learned Government Advocate appears for the State respondents. JUDGE Comparing Assistant