APHC010323912013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] TUESDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1614/2013 Between: 1. KATURI VENKATESH,, S/O YEDUKONDALU, R/O PORANKIVARIPALEM, NAGARAM MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP REP BY ITS PP HYD, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., at Hyderabad, through SHO., Ponnur Town PS.m, Guntur District. ...RESPONDENT Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toto file the against the Judgment and sentence passed in Crl.A.No.380 of 2012, dt. 31-07-2013 on the file of the Cour tof the Judge, Family Court-cum- XIII Addl. Dist. Judge, Guntur by confirming the Judgment passed in J.C.C.No.44 of 2010, dt. 05-10-2012 on the file of the Court of the Juvenile Board-cum- IV Addl. Junior Civil Judge Court, Guntur. IA NO: 1 OF 2013(CRLRCMP 2456 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of the certified copy of the Judgment passed in JCC.No.44 of 2010, dt. 05-10-2012 on the file of the Juvenile Board-cum- IV Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Court, Guntur. IA NO: 2 OF 2013(CRLRCMP 2479 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the petitioner/accused on bail by suspending the execution of sentence passed Judgment Dt.31.7.2013 on the file of the court of the Judge, Family Court-Cum XII Addl. Dist., Judge, Guntur by confirming the Judgment passed in JCC No.44 of 2010 dt.5.10.2012 on the file of the court of the Juvenile Board-Cum-IV Addl. Junior Civil Judge Court, Guntur, pending disposal of the main criminal revision case, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent: 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous. 2. In view of the above submission, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 08.07.2025 TM 86 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1614 of 2013 Date: 08.07.2025 TM