Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22958 (JHR)

KAMESHWAR PANDEY v. ISRAIL ANSARI

C.M.P./479/2022 · 2025-03-21

Sri Ananda Sen

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No.479 of 2022 ------ Kameshwar Pandey, son of Late Harisewak Ram Pandey, resident of Village Charhu, P.O. & P.S. Kisko, District Lohardaga, Jharkhand. … … Petitioner Versus 1. Ishrail Ansari 2. Abdul Mannan 3. Md. Zahir 4. Md. Jamir 5. Abdul Zahir 6. Md. Shamim 7. Md. Halim 8. Md. Kalim 9. Ramzahan Khatoon 10. Hushna Khatoon 11. Nagina Khatoon 12. Sahnaj Khatoon 13. Jahuran Khatoon 14. Tahuran Khatoon 15. Bibi Gondwa 16. Nejawat Ansari 17. Roshan Biwi 18. Deputy Commissioner, Lohardaga 19. Gautam Ram Pathak 20. Tapaswi Ram Pathak 21. Dhaneshwar Pandey 22. Bisheshwar Pandey 23. Rajeshwar Pandey … … Opp. Parties ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the O.P. : -- ------- CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ 05 /21.03.2025 I.A. No.10856 of 2024 This interlocutory application has been filed by the petitioners praying therein to condone the delay of 63 days in preferring the Civil Misc. Petition. 2 2. After going through the averments made in para-5 to 16 of this interlocutory application and upon hearing the parties, I am satisfied that sufficient cause has been shown for condoning the delay caused in preferring the Civil Misc. Petition. Delay of 63 days in preferring the Civil Misc. Petition is condoned. 3. This interlocutory application stands allowed. C.M.P. No.479 of 2022 4. This Civil Misc. Petition is taken on board. 5. This Civil Misc. Petition has been preferred for restoration of C.R. No.45 of 2018 to its original file, which was dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 06.03.2020, for removing the defects. 6. Learned counsel representing the petitioners submits that no sooner the C.R. application is restored to its original file, he will remove the surviving defects. 7. Considering the submission of learned counsel representing the petitioners, this Civil Misc. Petition stands allowed. 8. The C.R. No.45 of 2018, is restored to its original file with a condition that if the defects are not removed within four weeks, this order will not be given effect to. (ANANDA SEN, J.) Prashant.Cp-2