HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 29426 of 2025 Court No. - 65 (Sr. No.142 out of 259) HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record. As informed by learned State Law Officer, notice to the informant has been served on 21.08.2025, but none is present on behalf of the informant. 2. Heard Sri Manvendra Singh, Advocate holding brief of Sri Shantanu, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Jai Kishan Chaurasia, learned State Law Officer for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.55 of 2025, under Sections 64, 352, 351(3) of BNS, Sections 3/4 of POCSO Act and Section 66D of I.T. Act, Police Station- Pailani, District- Banda, during the pendency of trial. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The victim is a consenting party, as she had married the applicant. She has expressed her willingness to stay only in the house of the applicant. Even in the instant bail application, the affidavit has been sworn by the victim herself. The allegation that the applicant sent indecent photographs of the victim to her erstwhile husband, with whom her marriage was proposed to be solemnized, is per se false. The applicant has no criminal history and is in jail since 13.06.2025. He undertakes to cooperate with the trial and not misuse the liberty of bail. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anshul Tiwari, Shantanu, Vikram Singh Shrivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Shobhit Yadav Rohit Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) 5. Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the bail application but could not dispute the submissions made by the counsel for the applicant. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, prima-facie the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant- Rohit Singh, be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to verification of sureties, with the conditions that he shall not tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses and shall appear before the trial court as required. 8. Breach of any condition shall entail cancellation of bail. The observations herein shall not affect the trial on merits. April 23, 2026 (Ravi Kant) BAIL No. 29426 of 2025 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad