Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22949 (AP)

SYED ABDUL MAJID v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/16126/2025 · 2025-06-30

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010322902025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE A PRESENT , HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N r* WRIT PETITION NO: 16126 OF 2025 Between: Syed Abdul Majid, S/o. Syed Subhani Age 26 years, Occ: Photographer, R/o. 2-49a, Hazarath Gudem, Prakasam District. ...Petitioner 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Amaravati. 2. The Superintend of Police, Prakasam District, Ongole. 3. The Deputy Superintend of Police, Darsi Sub-division, Darsi, Prakasam District^ 4. The Station House Officer, Podili Police Station, Prakasam District. 5. The Sub Inspector of Police, Podili Police Station, Prakasam District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Wirt, Direction or Order directing the action of the respondent no 4 and 5 in threatening, harassing and pressuring the petitioner and his family members to come to the police station without following any procedure as of Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 21, of the illegal, arbitrary and violative Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents to ensure protection of life and liberty of the petitioner and his family members from any illegal action by police authorities. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 not to call the petitioner and his family members to the police station without following due process of law. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI VELURI [3HARAT SURENDER REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME .The Court made the following order: APHC010322902025 > / IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) / [3457] TUESDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 16126/2025 Between: 1.SYED ABDUL MAJID, S/0 SYED SUBHANI AGE 26 YEARS, OCC PHOTOGRAPHER, R/0 2-49A, HAZARATH GUDEM, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI. 2.THE SUPERINTEND OF POLICE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ONGOLE. 3.TFfMEPUTY SUPERINTEND OF POLICE, DARSI SUB-DIVISION, DARSI, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PODILI POLICE STATION, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 5.THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, PODILI POLICE STATION, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT{S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Wirt, Direction or Order directing the action of the respondent no 4 and 5 in threatening, harassing and pressuring the petitioner and his family members to come to the police station without following any 2 oTlndia'lr and 21, of protection of life and liberty of”11' Illegal action by police authorities and jA NO: 1 OF 9()9R - .."ssrs „r.^rr"rr•“ •““ Pleased to direct the Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 not to cal;! aliVl^' ot the police station without following due Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.VELURI BHARAT SURENDER REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: and his family members from any \ pass may be pleased petitioner and process of law 3 ORDER:- Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be order as to costs. no As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- K KASIRAO ACHARI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To. 1. One CC to Sri Veluri Bharat Surender Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra 3. Two CD Copies Pradesh [OUT] Cnr HIGH COURT DATED:01/07/2025 S 2 ' AU6 2025 Cun»nl swion ■ ORDER WP NO. 16126 OF 2025 DISMISSING THE W.P AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS