SUMITHKUMAR v. The State of Tamilnadu Rep. by The Inspector of Police,
CRL MP/20289/2025 · 2025-11-03
K Rajasekar
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 229458 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 229458 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL MP No. 20289 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03-11-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR CRL MP No. 20289 of 2025 in Crl OP No.27212 of 2025 SUMITHKUMAR Petitioner(s) Vs The State of Tamilnadu Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Tiruppur South Police Station, Crime No. 616/2025. Respondent(s) PRAYER To modify the condition 7(b) para in Crl.O.P.No.27212 of 2025 date
03.10.2025. For Petitioner(s): T. Balaji For Respondent(s): Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl.Side) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL MP No. 20289 of 2025
ORDER This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is filed seeking for modification of the conditions imposed upon the petitioner by this Court in Paragraph No.7(b) in Crl.O.P.No.27212 of 2025, dated 03.10.2025.
2. Earlier this Court granted bail to the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No. 27212 of 2025, dated 03.10.2025 directing him to deposit a sum of Rs.25,000/- as non- refundable deposit through RTGS/NEFT/Cash/demand Draft in favour of the Dean, Rajiv Gandhi Government General Hospital, Chennai, bearing A/c. No.10273425961, State Bank of India, Park Town, Chennai-68, Evening Bazaar Road, Chennai, IFSC:SBIN0001856, without prejudice to his defence before the Trial Court and the learned Judicial Magistrate, after perusing the challan/receipt, shall accept the sureties furnished by the petitioner. 3.Today, when the matter taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was unable to deposit the aforesaid amount due to his inability to mobilize the funds and he is not in a position to https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL MP No. 20289 of 2025 do any employment till date. 4.Mr.A.Gopinath, learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police submits that the petitioner has not complied with the conditions imposed by this Court. 5.Considering the fact that the petitioner has not complied with the conditions imposed by this Court and after hearing the submissions made by the
learned Counsel on either side, this Court is not inclined to modify the conditions imposed in Paragraph No.7(b) in Crl.O.P.No.27212 of 2025, dated
03.10.2025. 6.Accordingly, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed. However, the petitioner is directed to comply with the conditions imposed by this Court in Crl.O.P.No.27212 of 2025 dated 03.10.2025. 03-11-2025 GBI https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL MP No. 20289 of 2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL MP No. 20289 of 2025 To 1.The State of Tamilnadu Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Tiruppur South Police Station, Crime No. 616/2025. 2.The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL MP No. 20289 of 2025 K.RAJASEKAR J. gbi CRL MP No. 20289 of 2025
03-11-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis