Page No.# 1/3 GAHC030005272024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : RFA/29/2024 Sh. K. Vanlalrinnunga S/o K.T. Dawla (L) R/o Bethlehem Vengthlang, Aizawl, Mizoram VERSUS Smt. Lalduhzuali Khiangte D/o K. Hmingdailova R/o Bethlehem Vengthlang, Aizawl, Mizoram Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr B Lalramenga Advocate for the Respondent : Mr. T Lalnunsiama Linked Case : I.A.(Civil)/133/2024 Sh. K. Vanlalrinnunga S/o K.T. Dawla (L) R/o Bethlehem Vengthlang Aizawl Mizoram VERSUS Smt. Lalduhzuali Khiangte D/o K. Hmingdailova Page No.# 2/3 R/o Bethlehem Vengthlang Aizawl Mizoram Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr B Lalramenga Advocate for the Respondent : Mr. T Lalnunsiama B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO ORDER 20.01.2025 With the appearance of Mr. T Lalnunsiama, learned counsel for the sole respondent, notice is complete. Mr. B Lalramenga, learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant may be admitted and the LCR may be called. He submits that the impugned Judgment & Order dated 17.05.2024 and the Decree drawn on the same date by this Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division- II, Aizawl District, Aizawl in Declaratory Suit No. 10/2020 declaring the respondent to be legal heiress of Sh. K.T Dawla (L) in respect of the LSC No. Azl. 1022/1985 and the building standing thereon located at Bethlehem Vengthlang, Aizawl should be set aside in view of the fact that the appellant is the only son of late K.T Dawla, whereas the respondent is the grand-daughter. The learned counsel submits that the appellant has a better claim and right over the property in question and therefore, the impugned Judgment & Order and Page No.# 3/3 the Decree should be set aside. In view of above, let the appeal be admitted. Call for the LCR. Issue notice to the respondent. Since Mr. T Lalnunsiama, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the sole respondent. No formal notice is required. The appellant shall furnish requisite copies of the Memo of Appeal to Mr. T Lalnunsiama, learned counsel, if not already done. List the matter again on receipt of the LCR. Having regard to the projection made by the appellant, it is hereby directed in interim that the respondent shall not alienate the property till the disposal of the instant appeal. JUDGE Comparing Assistant